# Reply to recap comments with useful context and evidence

Original constructed exercises. No real account data, study participants or customer outcomes. The two expanded comparisons retain six earlier cases in total; those are not new cases.

## Resolve three different reply jobs

C1 — Constructed definition question: “Are these 15 people who saw the post?” The source has 15 public reaction/comment events and no private reach observation. Useful response: “The 15 is a count of those public events in the collected sample; it does not count all viewers or distinct readers.” Outcome: the definition is clarified; no viewership number or customer result is invented.

C2 — Constructed correction: the caption says “doubled” but the comparable values are 10 and 15. Useful response acknowledges the error and states that the increase is five, or 50% against ten. Review and correct the original caption as well. Outcome: correction decision and source repair, not a claim that every previous viewer received a correction.

C3 — Constructed disclosure request: someone asks which named client produced the result, but that context is not approved for public use. Useful response keeps the boundary and offers the general method without identifying details. Outcome: substantive explanation with the private context withheld; the public comment is not an automatic invitation to publish a customer record.