# Invite a relevant audience to follow a Page with the right sender and credit scope

Original constructed teaching cases. No real accounts, participants, interviews or customers. Read the complete matching guide and do not substitute these examples for missing evidence.

I1 — Constructed allowance: the Page shows six remaining shared credits, while two admins have each prepared four names. Decision: coordinate one combined relevant set within the actual allowance before either sends. Outcome: a bounded plan for eight proposed names, not eight completed invitations or a promised credit-return rule.

I2 — Constructed wrong expectation: an admin expects the invitation to appear from the organization alone. Current help says it comes from the personal profile and includes the sender’s name. Decision: confirm that the actual sender is appropriate before sending or hold. Outcome: no misleading claim that the Page anonymously invited people.

I3 — Constructed result: four invitations were actually sent in the supplied exercise, while the Page gains three followers during the day. Decision: preserve sent count and follower gain as different observations. Outcome: no inference that exactly three invitees accepted or that any recipient consented to promotional email.