# Review audience fit without identifying the people behind a breakdown

Original constructed teaching cases. No real accounts, participants, interviews or customers. Read the complete matching guide and do not substitute these examples for missing evidence.

A1 — Constructed breakdown: 40% in a reporting-related job category and 30% in one region, both with a clearly stated shared population. Their overlap can range from 0% to 30%; multiplying to 12% assumes an independence not supplied. Decision: retain separate shares and inspect whether the post explains the reporting task. No invented local buyer segment.

A2 — Constructed connections-only post: 60 reactions are visible, but demographics are unavailable. Decision: record the actual visibility and missing breakdown, then review the allowed conversation for specific questions. Outcome: no claim that the intended industry was absent, and no switch to public merely to obtain another chart.

A3 — Constructed selected evidence: a top company appears in the viewer breakdown and one public comment asks how to label dates. Decision: answer the date question with a source example. Outcome: a justified content follow-up; the company label does not establish that the commenter works there or that the company is a customer.