# Review profile discovery without turning appearances into visitors

Original constructed teaching cases. No real accounts, participants, interviews or customers. Read the complete matching guide and do not substitute these examples for missing evidence.

D1 — Constructed dashboard: 800 all appearances, 120 search appearances and 30 profile views are copied from separately labeled cards. The draft calls 30/800 a verified visitor conversion. Decision: keep all three labeled observations, confirm their periods, and remove the funnel claim. The review can still ask whether the profile explains the author’s actual documentation work.

D2 — Constructed relevance mismatch: a search category says “sales manager,” while the author’s verified work is preparing data dictionaries. Decision: inspect the saved headline/About wording and any ambiguous role label. Proposed revision: “I document reporting fields and source limits.” This clarifies a real task; it does not promise a ranking improvement or identify the searchers.

D3 — Constructed access gap: the account shows search appearances but no detailed viewing-time panel. Decision: record that limitation and review the visible description and example link. Outcome: a useful profile-edit decision with behavioral analytics unknown; no fabricated viewing time, named visitor or trial subscription.